The Issue with Troy

NASA research of earth-moon mechanics by late astrophysicist Robert Newton leads MSU mathematicians to a breakthrough in the chronology and history of ancient Greece. ‘

NASA research of earth-moon mechanics by late astrophysicist Robert Newton leads MSU mathematicians to a breakthrough in the chronology and history of ancient Greece. ‘The Issue with Troy’ shows the amazed reader that the whole Troy story was a swindle exercised by German ‘archeologist ‘adventurer Schleiman.

Dr. Fomenko follows Sir Isaac Newton’s ideas in «The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended» and applies Occam’s razor (among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected) he concludes that Homer’s history of Troy is pure fiction.

Indeed, the consensual localization for Homer’s Troy is Hisarlik near the Hellespont straits. Herr Heinrich Schliemann used this hypothesis for solemnly baptizing as “Troy” the 100 by 100 meter excavation site of a minuscule ancient settlement (such ruins do abound there) that he had discovered near the Hellespont, where he announced the finding of gold of Priam artefacts that he himself designed and manufactured by Paris jewelers Bulgari.

Schliemann’s excavation of nine levels of archaeological remains with dynamite was constructive for supporting Homer’s Iliad but somewhat destructive for any significant historical artifacts, including the level that is presumed to be the historical Troy.

Compared to his ‘archeology’ the Hollywood’s Troy can be considered as an excellent irrefutable documentary. Herr Schliemann (1822-1890) was a German businessman-adventurer of Indiana Jones mold. Hyssarlik should be renamed again from Troy into Schliemannstadt.

The reason for such speedy discovery was that all things ‘ancient’ Greek were fashion very much in demand in Berlin of 1868. The ‘Ancient’ Rome brand was too French and thus corrupt. German Reich was to be built on a clean of ‘ancient’ Greek example and style. Just look at German buildings and monuments of that period. German Indiana Schliemann did his job and delivered the goods. Sieg Heil!

On one hand, Dr. Fomenko et al call everybody, historians including, to apply Occam’s razor to world history and connect the dots. On the other the scientists Dr. Fomenko et al are ready to recognize the alleged mistakes of New Chronology theory, to repent, and to retract if and only if:
– radiocarbon dating methods or dendrochronology pass the clear anonymous ‘black box’ tests;
– astronomic data refute their results on solar eclipses;
– it is proven irrefutably that Robert Newton (NASA astrophysicist) was wrong to brand ‘ancient’ Ptolemy the greatest con man in history in his ‘Crime of Claudius Ptolemy’ ;

The radiocarbon dating labs run their very costly tests only if is the sample to be dated is accompanied with an idea of age pronounced by historians on basis of…subjective..mmm…gut-feeling and the history books they have been writing for the last 400 years. Radiocarbon labs happily bill for their fiddling and finetuning with C14 hardware to get the dates ‘to order’ of historians. Circulus Vicious is perfect.

PS: Prescient Saint Augustin said, “..beware of mathematicians, especially when they speak the truth! !”. Dr. Anatoly Fomenko is a Full Member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Full Member of the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Moscow State University Department of Mathematics and Mechanics. Solved the classical Plateau’s Problem from the theory of minimal spectral surfaces. Author of 210 scientific publications, 26 monographs, and textbooks on mathematics, a specialist in geometry and topology, variational calculus, symplectic topology, Hamiltonian geometry and mechanics, computational geometry. Dr. Fomenko has issues with the Art of History when he dares to apply new empirical-statistical methods.

shows the amazed reader that the whole Troy story was a swindle exercised by German ‘archeologist ‘adventurer Schleiman.

Dr. Fomenko follows Sir Isaac Newton’s ideas in «The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended» and applies Occam’s razor (among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected) he concludes that Homer’s history of Troy is pure fiction.

Indeed, the consensual localization for Homer’s Troy is Hisarlik near the Hellespont straits. Herr Heinrich Schliemann used this hypothesis for solemnly baptizing as “Troy” the 100 by 100 meter excavation site of a minuscule ancient settlement (such ruins do abound there) that he had discovered near the Hellespont, where he announced the finding of gold of Priam artefacts that he himself designed and manufactured by Paris jewelers Bulgari.

Schliemann’s excavation of nine levels of archaeological remains with dynamite was constructive for supporting Homer’s Iliad but somewhat destructive for any significant historical artifacts, including the level that is presumed to be the historical Troy.

Compared to his ‘archeology’ the Hollywood’s Troy can be considered as an excellent irrefutable documentary. Herr Schliemann (1822-1890) was a German businessman-adventurer of Indiana Jones mold. Hyssarlik should be renamed again from Troy into Schliemannstadt.

The reason for such speedy discovery was that all things ‘ancient’ Greek were fashion very much in demand in Berlin of 1868. The  ‘Ancient’ Rome brand was too French and thus corrupt. German Reich was to be built on a clean of ‘ancient’ Greek example and style. Just look at German buildings and monuments of that period. German Indiana Schliemann did his job and delivered the goods. Sieg Heil!

On one hand, Dr. Fomenko et al call everybody, historians including, to apply Occam’s razor to world history and connect the dots. On the other the scientists Dr. Fomenko et al are ready to recognize the alleged mistakes of New Chronology theory, to repent, and to retract if and only if:
– radiocarbon dating methods or dendrochronology pass the clear anonymous ‘black box’ tests;
– astronomic data refute their results on solar eclipses;
– it is proven irrefutably that Robert Newton (NASA astrophysicist) was wrong to brand ‘ancient’ Ptolemy the greatest con man in history in his ‘Crime of Claudius Ptolemy’ ;

The radiocarbon dating labs run their very costly tests only if is the sample to be dated is accompanied with an idea of age pronounced by historians on basis of…subjective..mmm…gut-feeling and the history books they have been writing for the last 400 years. Radiocarbon labs happily bill for their fiddling and finetuning with C14 hardware to get the dates ‘to order’ of historians. Circulus Vicious is perfect.

PS: Prescient Saint Augustin said, “..beware of mathematicians, especially when they speak the truth! !”. 

About the Author: Dr.Fomenko, Anatoly. Born in 1945. Full Member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Full Member of the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Moscow State University Department of Mathematics and Mechanics. Solved the classical Plateau s Problem from the theory of minimal spectral surfaces. Author of the theory of invariants and topological classification of integrable Hamiltonian dynamic systems. Laureate of the 1996 National Premium in Mathematics of the Russian Federation for a cycle of works on the Hamiltonian dynamic system multitude invariance theory. Author of 180 scientific publications, 26 monographs, and textbooks on mathematics, a specialist in geometry and topology, variational calculus, symplectic topology, Hamiltonian geometry and mechanics, computational geometry. Author of a number of books on the development of new empirical-statistical methods and their application to the analysis of historical chronicles as well as the chronology of Antiquity and the Middle Ages.

 LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.   

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition. 

Table of Contents V1



Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

  • Differential Geometry and Topology

  • Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.

  • Variational Principles in Topology.Multidimensional Minimal SurfaceTheory

  • Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.

  • Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.

  • Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics

  • Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.

  • The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2

  • Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)

  • Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.

  • Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.

  • Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi

  • USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.

  • Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.

  • Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin

  • USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.

  • Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6

  • USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.

  • Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry,Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.

  • Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev

  • Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.

  • Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.

  • Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov

  • Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.

  • The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov

  • Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.

  • Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov

  • Taylor and Francis, 2003.

  • Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.

  • Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval

  • Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.

  • Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s

  • Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.

  • New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.

  • Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.

  • Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.